This is because even the secularists in the west are at the very least influenced by living in a Judeo-Christian cultural society to some degree. Freedom of information is one thing, respect to another beliefs is another but in this case I want to know more the legal ethics, and it seems like wikipedia supports illegal activities or material that violates copy right and personal property laws. It is common curtesy for every human being to be sensitive towards others, no matter how silly this may seem to them.   If you have the right to repeat yourself and be a Baha'i partisan here, I have a right to respond to the Baha'i partisans. It is rather that Baha'is would wish to view it in a respectful mode, the display of which on hte website not being seen as such. (Yes, I know that there's and index at the top, but that's not necessarily the best defense.). I appreciate the civility with which the issue has been debated, and it speaks to the immense value of consultation and NPOV, but this is a real shame -- this is a gem of an article in its tone, information, and objectivity, and could serve as an example of the great potential of Wikipedia. The stuff I would write would stick and never leave those pages, because others would demand it. I mean, Madison Avenue savvy. If so, how? It could be argued that these are in 'poor taste' as well. So, if an encyclopedia intends to be neutral, then the aim is to display information in way that does not drastically offend anyone. Your email message of 4 September 1999 to the Universal House of Justice concerning the contents of the Web site ... has been referred to our Office for response. There is a separation between liberalism in academia, and what many would find to be just tasteless. I am not speaking for all Baha'i's, not if what I am saying comes from official statements. 69.226.34.83 05:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC), nope, when i type in Muhammad on search, and go to His page i do NOT see Muhammad's picture anywhere. When I open the page of fellatio, I want to see a picture of fellatio (regularly authorized by its author) or insert one if there aren't any, as this is a free encyclopedia where neutral information is provided. Comme il bénéficiait de puissantes protections, ses ennemis hésitèrent à le tuer comme les autres bábis et décidèrent de confisquer tous ses biens puis de l’exiler avec sa famille le plus loin possible en espérant sa mort. To MARussellPESE, first of all - let me clarify. Master Censor. Or their "top down" control structure? The first thing that moved me (in my 'independent investigation') was a picture of Abdu'l-Baha.